Argentina's President Javier Milei Slams UN 'Leviathan' at General Assembly, Rejects 'Pact for the Future' in Favor of 'Agenda of Freedom'
Speaking at the United Nations General Assembly, brash libertarian President Javier Milei criticized the organization as a "Leviathan" monster, rejected its 'Pact for the Future' and pledged instead an 'agenda of freedom'.
In a fiery speech where he also said the UN had become "powerless" in its key role to help prevent conflicts, Milei attacked the body's future pact adopted on Sunday calling it "socialist" and said the UN's remit had become "distorted".
"It has become a multi-tentacled Leviathan that seeks to decide what each nation state should do and how the citizens of the world should live," the right-wing economist and former pundit said, a reference to the giant mythological sea monster.
"The same always happens with the ideas of the left. They design a model according to what human beings should do, and when things turn out differently, they repress, restrict and curtail their freedom."
In a bold move at the United Nations General Assembly, Argentina's President Javier Milei criticized the organization, labeling it as a "Leviathan" monster and rejecting its 'Pact for the Future'. Instead, he advocated for an 'agenda of freedom', denouncing the UN's perceived socialist tendencies and loss of efficacy in conflict prevention.
Milei's speech highlighted his belief that the UN had overstepped its bounds, attempting to dictate the actions of individual nations and constrain global citizens. By framing the UN as a behemoth entity with excessive control, Milei positioned himself as a champion of individual liberty and autonomy.
This critique sheds light on the ongoing debate surrounding international governance and the balance between collective oversight and personal freedom. Milei's stance challenges the status quo and invites reflection on the role of supranational organizations in shaping global policies.
In conclusion, Milei's bold statements at the UN General Assembly serve as a reminder of the divergent perspectives on international cooperation and sovereignty. By questioning the UN's authority and advocating for a more libertarian approach, Milei sparks a dialogue on the future of global governance and individual rights.