Utah Challenges Federal Control Over Land in Supreme Court Lawsuit
Utah filed a lawsuit in the U.S. Supreme Court challenging federal control over more than a third of the land within its borders. The state argues that U.S. government policies are restricting access to these lands for recreation, energy, and infrastructure development. This move is part of a broader pushback by Republican-led states against federal land management policies under President Joe Biden's administration.
Utah Attorney General Sean Reyes has asked the Supreme Court to address whether the federal government can indefinitely hold lands within a state that are not designated for specific purposes like national parks, monuments, or tribal lands. Approximately 70% of Utah's land is owned by the federal government, with 34% controlled by the Bureau of Land Management.
Governor Spencer Cox expressed frustration with the limitations imposed by federal control, stating that it hinders the state's ability to manage and protect its natural resources. The legal challenge is based on the U.S. Constitution's provision for the Supreme Court to have "original jurisdiction" over disputes involving states.
This lawsuit follows Utah's earlier legal action against the Biden administration's policy allowing BLM to lease land for conservation, in line with the President's goal of conserving 30% of America's land and water. A conservation group argues that only Congress has the authority to transfer or dispose of federal lands.
In conclusion, Utah's lawsuit against federal control over its land highlights the ongoing debate between states and the federal government over land management. The outcome of this case could have significant implications for the state's ability to utilize its natural resources and could set a precedent for other states facing similar challenges. It is essential for residents to stay informed about these developments as they could impact their access to public lands and economic opportunities.