Citigroup Faces Racial Discrimination Lawsuit Over ATM Fee Waivers: Legal Battle Explained
By Jonathan Stempel
(Multibagger) - Citigroup Inc., the third-largest bank in the United States, has requested a U.S. judge to dismiss a racial-discrimination lawsuit alleging that the bank violated federal civil rights laws by waiving ATM fees for customers of minority-owned banks.
Background of the Case
In May, Florida residents Werner Jack Becker and Dana Guida, who are not Citigroup customers, filed a lawsuit claiming they were charged ATM fees by Citigroup while customers of minority-owned banks were exempt. The plaintiffs argue that this policy, which has been in place since 2016, discriminates against customers of banks owned by individuals of "the wrong race."
Citigroup’s Defense
Citigroup’s court filing in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, argues that their ATMs do not have the capability to identify a user's race, making race irrelevant in the charging of fees. The bank also stated that Becker and Guida are not contractually obligated to use Citigroup ATMs and have not demonstrated that their own banks were treated unfairly. Citigroup emphasized that federal civil rights law does not serve as a solution for every racial injustice.
Legal Representation and Broader Context
The plaintiffs are represented by Consovoy McCarthy, a law firm known for advocating conservative causes. Notably, the firm successfully convinced the U.S. Supreme Court to reject race-based college admissions programs in 2023.
Citigroup’s Policy and Its Implications
Citigroup asserts that the ATM fee waiver program aims to enhance banking access for communities of color. The bank disputed claims that the program is racially biased, noting that 14 of the 50 participating lenders are not minority-owned.
Case Details
The case, Becker et al v. Citigroup Inc., is filed under the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, No. 24-60834.
---
Breaking Down the Case: What It Means for You
What’s Happening?
Citigroup is facing a lawsuit alleging racial discrimination for waiving ATM fees for customers of minority-owned banks. Two Florida residents claim this policy discriminates against them because their banks are not minority-owned.
Why Should You Care?
This lawsuit could set a precedent for how financial institutions implement policies aimed at promoting financial inclusion. If Citigroup loses, it could lead to changes in how banks structure fee waivers and other customer incentives, potentially affecting your banking experience.
How Could This Affect Your Finances?
If you frequently use out-of-network ATMs, the outcome of this case could influence whether you face fees in the future. A ruling against Citigroup might make banks reconsider similar fee waivers, leading to more uniform ATM charges across all banks.
In Simple Terms:
This legal battle is about whether Citigroup’s policy of waiving ATM fees for certain customers is fair. The outcome could impact how banks design their fee structures and might affect your wallet if you use ATMs from different banks.
Stay informed and watch how this case unfolds, as it has the potential to reshape banking policies and fees in the future.